This is just a place to give my thoughts so that they do not eat me alive. I may post about my Life, music, sports or whatever I feel like.

Showing posts with label Roger Goddell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Goddell. Show all posts

This makes it sound like Mike Vick wasn't 'ALLOWED' to go to Cincy or Buffalo...@ this upcoming GQ article......

Michael Vick on not originally wanting to come to Philly:
"I think I can say this now, because it's not going to hurt anybody's feelings, and it's the truth... I didn't want to come to Philadelphia. Being the third-team quarterback is nothing to smile about. Cincinnati and Buffalo were better options."
Those two teams wanted him and would've allowed him to start, but after meeting with commissioner Roger Goodell and other reps from the NFL, Vick was convinced-and granted league approval-to sign with Philly. "And I commend and thank them, because they put me in the right situation."

Should be a good read tomorrow...


Oh and we aren't surprised are we? -_- @ GODdell




Source
Share:

James Harrison...being...well...James Harrison...Men's Journal interview. Speaks on the commisioner and his team.



Here is the original link...






This is the part that has everyone in an uproar...




On high and low hits:
“I get dinged about three times a year and don’t know where I am for a little minute. But unless I’m asleep, you’re not getting me out of the game, and most guys feel the same way. If a guy has a choice of hitting me high or low, hit me in the head and I’ll pay your fine. Just don’t hit me in the knee, ‘cause that’s life-threatening. How’m I going to feed my family if I can’t run?”

On the 2004 season:
“I should have another ring. We were the best team in football in 2004, but the Patriots, who we beat during the regular season, stole our signals and picked up 90 percent of our blitzes [in the AFC title game]. They got busted for it later, but, hey, they’re Goodell’s boys, so he slapped ‘em $500,000 and burned the tapes. Was he going to rescind their Super Bowls? Man, hell no!”

On the two interceptions thrown by Ben Roethlisberger in last year’s Super Bowl:
“Hey, at least throw a pick on their side of the field instead of asking the D to bail you out again. Or hand the ball off and stop trying to act like Peyton Manning. You ain’t that and you know it, man; you just get paid like he does.”

On Pittsburgh safety Troy Polamalu:
“He’s the one guy in football I respect absolutely, ‘cause he’s spiritual and lives it like he talks it. You know, he gets more flags than anyone on our team but never gets fined for nothin’. He’s so polite and talks so softly that he could tell he could tell Goodell to kiss his ass, and Goodell would smile and say thank you.”







You can read the rest of the article but I want to talk specifically about these parts of it and people's reactions to it.


First of all, it is JAMES HARRISON. When has he NOT spoken his mind? This is the same dude that refused to go to the White House. Pulled the crazy fan off the field. Basically does CRAZY SHIT. All. The. Time. So color me surprised that he did an interview, saying things that most wouldn't say and he didn't flinch. It is your own fault if you are shocked James said these things.


Second, did he lie? I mean, lets go back and look at what he REALLY SAID. I mean did he lie? Did he not say pretty much the SAME THINGS THAT WE HAVE ALL SAID about all of those situations in some shape, form or fashion? Oh... Which leads me to the third and probably biggest point..


You people and your selective 'uncouth' tolerance. Your creed is flawed Jack..


"Everybody wants folks to be themselves and speak out...until they say some shit that you don't like.. As usual. Now cats want him to shut up" - Me on Twitter earlier on this very subject. 


I say that because for some of you, when James was speaking on the hitting issues and the fines, you were ALL FOR IT. When he went in on other subjects it was cool because he 'spoke his mind'. You loved it. Now that he does an interview speaking on Ben (right or wrong) or on Mendy (right or wrong) you wanna turn on him. It is your own fault though. See, the thing about condoning folk's unbridled behavior with out holding them to some standard is that is that you can't 'control what they might say. One day the 'verbal gun' is gonna get pointed back at you. Which is why I don't PROMOTE just wholehearted 'outspokenness without thinking' like many of you do. Now you want someone to 'control' him or to 'shut him up'. Don't beg off now. You should have thought about that when you said 'If BEAST doesn't want to see the President he doesn't have to...' or set the standard earlier. Now I am not saying James hasn't always been like this as I have not known hm his whole life. I DO KNOW, however that since he has been in the spotlight, this is his M.O. and not too many who are INSIDE the fan base or a fan of (for lack of a better term) 'asshole 101 speak' (Where you show NO TACT TO THE SITUATION AND SAY EXACTLY HOW YOU FEEL AT ALL TIMES. CONSEQUENCES BE DAMMED..) have been outraged. Now that he is calling out teammates, its a problem. Thing is, WHAT EXACTLY THE HELL DO YA'LL THINK THE WORD 'accountability' means when you spout it off after these players make mistakes? We all get on Twitter and Facebook and say things 100 TIMES WORSE than what James said. Hell, if he had called out William Gay I would be ELATED truthfully. Players messed up and he spoke on it. I don't see the big deal. Your favorite player does that shit and it is 'leadership'. James does it and it is 'being an ass'. Make up your minds people. He spoke up. If his teammates don't like it, they will say something to him. (Yeah...yeah..yeah..I know YOU WOULDN'T SAY ANYTHING TO HIM..way to make it all about you again. Good job Champ!)

Furthermore, STOP ACTING SHOCKED when James Harrison says things that maybe 'you wouldn't say'. Isn't that what you demand out of folks? Honesty? 

Or are you mad because James Harrison took all the 'speculation' out of what he is thinking and has reduced your 'lol' joke pool? @ those of you use 'speculation' as fodder for jokes. I know for some of you Life is no fun if you can't speculate about what others are feeling. (No, I am serious. I really think some of you have issues with that. Especially some of you dudes. Ya'll say girls gossip and speculate but man.....some of you ninjas is bitches too- Snoop) 


In any event, stay mad/shocked about whatever James said. Just remember, this is what he does and YOU ASKED FOR IT. Encouraged it even. Don't get mad now... 





*This post was in no way, shape or form MEANT TO be some 'journalistic' view. I wrote what I felt. You can deal with it or.....Oh and I didn't write about Hines because I don't 'know' enough about it to write on it other than the charge itself. Haven't found much really. Enlighten me if you happen to be privy. I would like to know more details myself.  


I see Rashard responded to the fumble comments.... here is the hotlink to the ESPN link...




Share:

Whoa..whoa..the NFL needs what Roger GODdell? @ stadiums and his 'status quo' rhetoric..

Someone PLEASE tell me this man doesn't expect me to BELIEVE THIS SHIT HERE?


The status quo means failing to recognize the many costs of financing, building, maintaining and operating stadiums. We need new stadiums in Los Angeles, Minneapolis, San Francisco, Oakland and San Diego; and the ability for more league investment in new technology to improve service to fans in stadiums and at home.


http://nfllabor.com/2011/02/15/commissioner-goodell-%E2%80%9Cwe-need-an-agreement-both-sides-can-live-with%E2%80%9D/



Yeah Roger? REALLY? Someone in Oakland get at me and tell me about the condition of your stadium please. Ditto the other places. WAIT LOS ANGELES? Is there even a TEAM IN LOS ANGELES? (I know the answer.) Whoa....


But you idiots wanna keep blaming THE PLAYERS. Yeah...So everyone is supposed to basically have a 'Jerry's World'? Is that it Roger?




Companies with far more revenue than the NFL have gone bankrupt because they mismanaged their costs and failed to address their problems before they became a crisis. The NFL has a track record over many decades of making good decisions that have led to unprecedented popularity. Negotiating a fair agreement will result in billions in pay and benefits to current players, improved benefits for retired players, and a sustainable business model for our teams.


Good one Roger! Bring the 'other' companies that MAKE more money than you do angle into it. That's it. Make it sound like you guys didn't enjoy YOUR BEST YEAR YET as far as making money. Sure.

The union has repeatedly said that it hasn’t asked for anything more and literally wants to continue playing under the existing agreement. That clearly indicates the deal has moved too far in favor of one side. Even the union’s president knows this — as he said on national radio on January 27: “I think what really happened is in 2006 we got such a great deal. I mean, the players got a good deal and the owners felt they got it handed to them.”


Oh so this is why you did those deals with the Networks in that way. Because of what the Union President said on JANUARY 27TH OF THIS YEAR. Allow me to point out though that YOU RECONSTRUCTING THOSE TV DEALS TWO YEARS AGO ROGER. So while your 'We got screwed and they know it' argument sounds REAL GOOD it doesn't excuse what happened in regards to that. You probably wouldn't have even bought that up if Doty hadn't ruled like he did. 'Cause you ALREADY had it planned out how you were gonna even that up.....@ this planned locked out. Real cute though. 


Hit the link up top if you want to read Roger's letter....
Share:

Very interesting letter in response to Roger GODdell's letter he sent to the fans by Nate Jackson, former Denver Bronco.

He pretty much said what we all have said. More credible coming from him though since he played in the League..The part about practice has often fallen on deaf ears so I was glad he bought that up. People thought I was nuts when I said it....

"What a buzzkill. On the eve of the playoffs, just when fans' excitement in the sport is cresting, Roger Goodell tripped on his shoestrings again, puked all over his keyboard, and then hit "send."

His letter to the fans in a nutshell: greedy players and broke owners. The NFL needs more money (more even than the many billions of dollars the new Monday Night Football TV contract will provide), and the athletes who populate the league need less. It's the same tune he's been practicing, but now sung with a bullhorn. He wants the fans to keep in mind, as they watch the playoffs, that the athletes on their televisions are overpaid hooligans whose bodies are not their own properties and thus shall have no say in the direction of the league as a whole.

Five years into his tenure, the players are realizing what they have in Roger Goodell. At first, it was hard to tell. He had a refined message and promised the players that he wouldn't change a thing, unless it was deemed necessary, in the name of progress. Players are always skeptical of the power structure in the NFL — coaches, owners, or, in this case, the commissioner. There is always a prevailing "us against them" feeling. Players know that loyalty and honesty are scarce at their level, but I think for the most part, the belief endured that Goodell would respect the sacrifice of the players and keep the ship steady.

But now there's a storm coming, and the skipper is drunk at the wheel. The first sign of this came after a few well-publicized player indiscretions. Goodell started beating his chest at the rest of us. We will not tolerate this. We will not tolerate that. Here is a video about it. Here is a pamphlet about it. Here is another pamphlet (he loves pamphlets). We'll be watching you. Here I am talking about it on television. Here I am again! How's my hair?

Goodell's failure to understand how this would be received by players has proved to be a recurring theme in his tenure. His vaunted code of conduct policy, his public flogging of the NFL's relatively few troublemakers, and his repeated cries for a "culture change," all seen by him as progress, were taken in the locker room as the opposite. One can only assume that a call for a "culture change" means that Goodell is unhappy with the current culture, or more to the point, with the players themselves. He is openly questioning their morals. Understanding that the majority of the players in the NFL are young black men, and he is representing the interests of old, rich, white owners, Goodell has needlessly widened the cultural rift between the players and the displeased owners who might wish their players weren't quite so black. That's not progress.

It also doesn't help that, in the eyes of the players, Goodell couldn't find his balls when he was in the same room with Brett Favre and a bagful of evidence. Roger could have given him a fitting retirement party, but he punked out.

Meanwhile, he had no problems locating his nuts when began doling out fines for what he perceived as overly vicious hits. But the way it looks in the locker room, the fines are a function of media attention and the marketability of the player getting hit. And if you accidentally graze the head of a quarterback, it's your ass. (And here we thought that's what helmets were for.) This is when Goodell's PR train permanently went off the rails. Players practice at full speed every week. They smack heads and then go watch it on film. They know everyone is getting hit in the head. The laughably inconsistent enforcement of the head-shot rule makes it clear to the players, or at least the vast majority of them: your brains are expendable.

And now its just getting silly. On the heels of an impassioned plea for safer play, he's aggressively pushing an 18-game season.

I know he's in a negotiation here, but don't put Icy Hot in my jockstrap and ask me why my balls itch. And the manner in which he is selling the longer season to the public insults the intelligence of the players even more. He says that it won't add a single game. It's still a 20-game format. Enough with the 20-game argument. Every player knows that during the four combined preseason games, the starters barely play a total four quarters, if that.

Preseason games are used to evaluate the bubble players who are fighting to make the team. My career owed itself, in no small part, to those preseason games. While the starters rested and prepared for the regular season, I had a chance to prove that I belonged. Take away two of them, and that chance is diminished.

Add two regular-season games, and careers will be shorter and life-changing injuries more frequent. As the body breaks down late in the season, the athlete's strength wanes and the difference between a routine play and a crippling injury gets smaller and smaller. But the pressure to perform never wanes, so the player must soldier on, knowing that if he can't go, someone else will. Players are reminded of that fact almost daily, and no one minces words. The threat of being replaced is a constant. Whether it is Game 2 or Game 18, you ignore the pain. The commissioner is sadly mistaken if he believes otherwise.

A team's training room at the end of the season is a battlefield scene: people lying on tables, things clamped to them, moaning in pain. Injured reserve players stack up as the season drags on. New players are signed to replace them, then suffer the same fate. Snap, crackle, pop. The players who can't practice during the week but end up playing anyway are injured. They shouldn't play; that's why they can't practice. But they get shot up on game day, or they don't, and they play anyway. Their adrenaline is through the roof and the drugs work, so they don't feel the pain that's telling them to stop. Fucking stop! But they don't heed the warnings, no one does, because playing with severe pain is an institutional reality that Goodell is either blind to or too dehumanized to care about. Regardless, the damage is done. More games, more damage.

Now, the picture of Goodell is clear: He is a guy eager to put his stamp on the league; he doesn't care what he is stamping just so long as it has his name on it. Problem is, he is losing the players, one PR gaffe at a time. The NFL is doing just fine on its own. It doesn't need Roger Goodell to be its pimp. Step out of the spotlight, Roger. It's not your show.
Share:

Six games....Four if he behaves...Ben Roethlisberger


FINALLY. I say that 'cause I am 'bout sick of seeing it everywhere and being asked about it. Not 'cause I think that Roger took too long. He didn't. Serious stuff going on here. You all know what it is. I am not breaking any news here and I didn't attempt to do it when I heard it in the wee hours of the morning. I decided to sit back and let everyone 'speculate' on it, talk about it, get their biases out of the way and all of that stuff.

So now, we all know what the price of Ben and his 'actions' I will speak on it. I think some action, in some sense, SHOULD BE TAKEN. I am not truly mad at the six games. I am a lil perturbed that many think it should be more or at the 'uproar' behind it.


I guess my issues are with 'what exactly everyone thinks his actions were', the personal agendas behind the words when they speak about him and the incidents/the bias some people are showing right now, the STILL UNFAIR WAY THE LEAGUE TREATS these types of things/race card thing and of course all this 'trade him' talk.

So lets go down the line.

What exactly everyone thinks his actions were/the bias some people are showing right now:


I think we can all pretty much agree that his lack of judgment as far as who he is and hanging out in 'college town' bars is a sticking point. Dumb. Point blank. I just find it funny to hear cats that I KNOW FOR A FACT STILL HANG AROUND YOUNG GIRLS saying shit about this dude doing this.

Oh so NOW YOU MOFOS see it being a problem smashing young girls (of age mind you)? Really? Everybody is riding their morality horse on this one when young black athletes are RIDING AROUND DOING THIS ALL THE TIME and getting caught up in allegations too. Cats playing the music, watching dudes do it speaking up now? Really? Now it is wrong? Word? But is okay if Santonio, Chris Henry, Pac Man Jones and others get themselves some 'above age but not mature enough to know better' snatch up in Love, Mansion, TheRoxy, Onxy or whatever major nightclub they are meeting/knocking off their fans at? We won't even start naming your favorite basketball/baseball/celeb who does this on the reg. Your favorite R&B singer. Your favorite rapper. Yeah, lets talk about that....

It isn't even that I don't agree with you either. It just looks MIGHTY funny that all of the sudden you guys 'care about' that shit. I have a whole lot of you flooding my time lines on the Net, in my ear out and about about this 'angle' of the story. This is no more than you guys see at the Lux, Pale Dogs and every other spot you frequent. Miss me with that angle RIGHT NOW. Better yet, this is what I want you to do. The next time your 'boy' (Yes you! I am talking to YOU!) goes after a 'young fresh and green') jawn in the club, STOP HIM. Give him that same speech that you are giving Ben AND SAYING HE SHOULD KNOW. I'll wait.....

Then I hear cats bemoaning about they have daughters and if it were them, the suspension would be the least of his worries. Word? So you aren't going to take your daughter to task for going out and putting herself in situations that require 'grown decision' making huh? You are just going to go ahead and 'enable' her (much like you are screaming people have rightfully enabled Ben) all for the sake of taking her side? See, this is the shit I am talking about. I don't hear you guys saying that if you aren't. I have daughters. I am not saying he wouldn't have to worry but I also know that they would have to own up to being in that club and breaking the law. I don't give a shit if it is 'what young people do at that age.' I would be in her shit 'cause I would have already told her about being grown too fast and doing shit she is not supposed to be doing. Like GOING OUT TO BARS AND DRINKING and putting herself in a vulnerable position. Facts are facts. She is not there, it doesn't happen to her. (Which would be my MAIN concern. You can get hypothetical all you want about 'it would have been someone else...' She is MY CONCERN.) Part of the reason the rules exist is due to maturity and because of (gasps) older guys shooting crabs in a barrel like Ben was doing that night. Told you I don't think he is 'guilt free'. He isn't. By a long shot. I know ya'll can't say it. Don't have the nuts to. So I will say it. In WRITING. Again, I am still gonnna 'do my fatherly duty' and get after whomever harms my daughters but if they are a party to the wrongdoing, I will not HESITATE TO GET IN HER SHIT ABOUT IT. I don't enable. Just like we all don't want to enable Ben.

Look, I don't take the allegation lightly AT ALL. Trust me when I tell you. I have actually stopped someone from doing that. Known people it has happened to. I have also been a witness to people being falsely accused. Even knowing all of that, I don't lack the ability to not blindly be hypocritical about the situation. Which some people clearly are. We STILL don't know what happened. We have a police report that says what she says happened. We have him saying 'he definitely had sex with her and that his actions were inappropriate' to some extent. That we do know. Everything else is speculation and THERE ARE NO CHARGES. I know we all wanna pull out the 'race' card on this one but quite honestly he is not the first athlete (black or white) to not have been charged but been accused. You holding a torch for them cats too? No, you are not.


The STILL UNFAIR WAY THE LEAGUE TREATS these types of things:

So let me get this straight. Someone can accuse you of something, no charges EVER GET FILED and you ARE STILL 9/10 SUSPEND ME ANYWAY? Really? How exactly does the League investigate to make sure I am not getting 'blackmailed'/black balled/or straight fucked over? How exactly does that work? So, if my family/former friends/associates or some person I don't know who has NOTHING TO LOSE decides to just up and make some allegations against me and their are unfounded, I would still get punished? Wow. That sounds like pure fuckery right there.

Now if this sounds familiar to some of you, this is PRETTY MUCH WHAT YOU WERE SCREAMING when all the 'black athletes who got dicked' were going through their thing. One SLIGHT PROBLEM WITH THE COMPARISON THE COMPARISON THOUGH. (Whispers) They got charged with a crime. That's right. They were charged. The League was also informed by law enforcement in each case that they would be too. (Go back and look it up. Oh wait. You know I am not lying.) The cops told Goddell when Vick was being investigated that he would be charged on a Federal level. Same thing in Pac Man's case @ the cops saying he would be charged. The pending investigations resulted in charges filed. As a matter of fact, one of the gentleman mentioned pleaded NO CONTEST to a crime. Now all you arm chair gangstas, negro street lawyers and the like ALL KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS DON'T YOU? Let me help you out as I know some of you will 'twist' the meaning a bit.

From the Latin saying, nolo contendre, no contest means the person does not refute the charges, but also does not claim guilt for the charges. However, while the person charged with the crime is not pleading guilty or contesting the charges, he or she is often considered guilty when pleading no contest. If sentencing for a crime is immediate then the plea does not carry any special weight when a judge considers sentencing.

"In fact, a person who wants a trial to defend his or her innocence would probably not use a no contest plea. Sometimes a court can be petitioned for a change of plea, but this is not always allowed. Instead, the no contest plea is almost always used when the plea results in immediate sentencing. Additionally, a person convicted of a crime who pleaded no contest is just as guilt as if he or she pleaded guilty.

In some cases, however, clients who feel they would not win at charges but assert their innocence are convinced to plead no contest since this will result in a plea bargain."


To quote Jemelle Hill earlier today..

"Jemele Hill: I have no problem w/ Ben’s punishment. It’s deserved. But some ppl acting like an “injustice” was done w/ other blk athletes. It wasn’t."



If Ben R were blk some of y'all would be hollering abt his suspension being an injustice, no charges, etc #yeahisaidit


Yes, he was. Pled down. RT @champmccullough: @jemelehill pacman never convicted



Ben is suspended 6 GAMES w/ NO CHARGES. That is a NEW NFL PRECEDENT. Pac, Vick, Stallworth, Plax -- all charged AND convicted.


Now I am not all for how the MEDIA treated all of those mentioned except maybe Adam. I felt all of them got shafted in some shape form or fashion. This case is a little different and I am going to need some of you to stop using it as a racial thing. Leave the big Joker in your hand and throw out that small spade so to speak....

All this 'trade him' talk:

You guys are funny. @ those that have been demanding we trade him since this broke. Your fandom/lack of rings is showing. Stop it. Shoutout to the Patriots fans who have been pretty mum. Reason being they don't have much to say is that they are not worried about us AND THEY HAVE chips. You can tell who does and doesn't have chips when this stuff breaks out. Everyone has an 'opinion' all of the sudden. All types of stuff becomes important.

We have a proud franchise who doesn't like trouble. We traded the one person we felt was expendable to send a message and now the pressure is on to trade Ben too. This is laughable to me accept for one scenario. The Raiders. I wouldn't mind that happening for their corner and a pick. That probably won't happen though so I think any TRUE trade scenarios are pure fantasy. We drafted with trading Santonio in mind (Mike Wallace). We have not done so with Ben in mind. Now if we draft a prime time quarterback with our first pick, you will know why. lol I would wait until that happened though.

How will we do this season? Who knows. I know I am still a fan. I also know I have faith in my team. We will find a way. Somehow. Maybe...just maybe....we can TRULY go back to what we said we were going to do anyway. RUNNING THE BALL. If we do that and play defense, I think we will be fine. The quarterback we will be missing is an important player for sure but we have won games with him having TERRIBLE games. Sometimes, honestly, we are too reliant on his heroics so this will be a gut check. The boy Troy is back and healthy by all accounts. We STILL HAVE the draft and people coming back. Signed Byron. (Hoping Dixon gets the nod though honestly and does well!). We have even MORE FUEL to play better in addition to last season's failures with this suspension. PLEASE COUNT US OUT. Please do it. You know what happened the last time ya'll did that when we didn't make the playoffs after having a Super Bowl hangover. So I beg you to count my team out. I think we need that honestly. It will help us.



I know some of you have trophy envy.....It is okay. You can cure it. Tell your team to win a chip or six....

Share:

If something happened, she needs to go in for the interview again.


Now I know that there will be some to cite how mentally draining these interviews can be, how scared she might be, and a whole plethora of reasons as to why she would choose not to go in for this interview with the police. That is fine. But you KNOW in your heart of hearts that this looks just as shady as it did when she claimed he assaulted her. Only now the shade is on her side. So in the interest fairness, I am going to need you guys to be just as vocal about her not doing her interview.

If he has an issue, like some of you are implying, the money for any 'settlement' would still be there after the guilty conviction so I don't really buy the whole 'He is buying her out but he is still guilty' theory you guys are about to throw out there. Matter of fact, getting a guilty plea probably would net her MORE MONEY. That leads me to believe something is amiss here. So the only conclusion I can come to is this.

What was said to have happened didn't happen but this is the best it is going to get for her. Money wise. (He DOES need this to go away as it is his second time being accused. Doesn't mean he did it though.) Not getting indicted wise ('cause if she filed a false police report some charges could be filed). You see, they aren't asking for his DNA anymore. Unlike what the idiot on ESPN failed to say, THIS LATEST issue could be why. She isn't talking to the cops. Hmmmmm...Wonder why that could be???? He is still gonna meet with GODdell though.

Time will tell what really happened.

Link


The case against Steelers' quarterback Ben Roethlisberger may be falling apart with no charges filed.

First there was the news that the Milledgeville, Ga., police are no longer requesting Roethlisberger's DNA, now Pittsburgh TV station KDKA is reporting that the 20-year-old woman who had accused Roethlisberger of sexual assault has not appeared for a follow-up interview with the police. The woman's attorney would not comment as to whether she's been willing to meet with the police.

KDKA reported that a source involved with the investigation said that the investigation has "hit a brick wall."

The police's decision to rescind a request for Roethlisberger's DNA can be interpreted in multiple ways, but it is pretty clear that if the alleged victim won't cooperate with the police the potential case against Roethlisberger will likely fall apart. Of course, she could reschedule her follow-up interview with the police at any time, but if she doesn't, experts told KDKA that the case will likely fall apart.

"Bottom line is no cooperative victim under these circumstances, probably no crime," Pittsburgh defense attorney Robert Del Greco told KDKA.

Roethlisberger is still supposed to meet with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, but if no charges end up being filed in this case then Roethlisberger would likely avoid any kind of NFL sanctioned punishment.


About the video footage..


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5026596&campaign=rss&source=twitter&ex_cid=Twitter_espn_5026596




The attorney representing the Georgia nightclub where Ben Roethlisberger is accused of sexually assaulting a college student said the club cannot salvage recorded video footage of the night the alleged incident took place.

The Capital City nightclub's system recorded over footage from March 5, attorney Carl Cansino told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review for Thursday's editions. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation was unable to retrieve the footage as potential evidence, he said.

"The DVD system overwrote itself," Cansino told the Tribune-Review. "Had it just been deleted, they might have been able to save some of it."

A source familiar with the investigation told ESPN's Kelly Naqi that there was no camera inside the Milledgeville nightclub that was pointed toward the bathroom where the 20-year-old woman claims the Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback "sexually assaulted or sexually manipulated" her -- many of the club's security cameras are focused on the main dance floor area. The value of any footage obtained from those recordings would be to see the demeanor of the accuser and her friends as they made their exit from the club, the source told Naqi.

The source also maintains club manager Rocky Duncan viewed the footage from the output of those cameras from the night in question before the GBI requested the footage from him, but said it was hard for Duncan to determine much from the footage because there were a couple of hundred people in the club and the footage is in black and white.

Duncan did not return a call from ESPN for comment.

The source added that the GBI initially had trouble getting the footage from the club's DVR but ultimately was successful in doing so. A call to GBI Public Information Officer John Bankhead was not immediately returned.

A member of Roethlisberger's entourage shot his own video inside the club, where Roethlisberger had gone to celebrate his birthday. According to Cansino, the video shows the accuser with the 28-year-old Roethlisberger, but the attorney described the footage as your standard home video.

Among the people who arrived at the club with Roethlisberger on March 5 were teammate Willie Colon, a Coraopolis, Pa., police officer and a Pennsylvania state trooper. Roethlisberger has a home about 30 miles from the nightclub.

The investigation is entering its third week. Roethlisberger has not been charged and his lawyer, Ed Garland, said this week that he hoped the investigation would wrap up within a month. Garland said he believes Roethlisberger will not be charged.

On Wednesday, the GBI withdrew its request for a DNA sample from Roethlisberger.

The Steelers start offseason practices and training sessions for regulars beginning Monday, and coach Mike Tomlin said he expects Roethlisberger to attend.
Share:

Uh oh....The Commish wants to meet w/Ben..Trouble.

We ALL know how this is gonna turn out. Either he is going to under do it or over do it. He rarely gets it RIGHT. Not that 'right' would be on the minds of most people on either side of the fence. We have those of us who want him 'lynched' like someone of color usually gets when the law is even 'mentioned' and then there are those of us who want NO ACTION. Guess ole boy can't win.

I am on the 'lets get some charges filed/look at the evidence/see if he is guilty side with the understanding that this is the second time so you could at least talk to him' side of things...

Link:


ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- NFL commissioner Roger Goodell says he plans to meet with Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger about the star's off-field problems.

Goodell already has spoken with team owners about Roethlisberger, who is accused of assaulting a 20-year-old college student in a Georgia nightclub on March 5. Roethlisberger's attorney says the quarterback committed no crime.

Goodell says the league "takes this issue very seriously," and that he is "concerned that Ben continues to put himself in this position."

Roethlisberger also is being sued by a woman who claims he raped her in 2008 at a Lake Tahoe hotel. He denies those allegations and has asked for counter-damages.

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/nfl/03/22/roger.goodell.big.ben.ap/index.html#ixzz0iw5h4jst
Get a free NFL Team Jacket and Tee with SI Subscription
Share:

Contact

A place for JUST the widowed part of my Life... The other blog I have.

  https://awidowedfatherof3.blogspot.com/ I wish I had been in the right mindframe to make this blog when it happened but I didn't.  The...