(Documents) Looks like @Pusha_T might have been onto something..

There is more...go on over to Julia Beverly Twitter..No, I don't know if they are 'official' court documents but they look pretty legit. Then again...we are GONNA FOUND OUT NOW AREN'T WE? @ THE RESPONSE FROM THOSE INVOLVED. That is also why I didn't say the artist's name..I know the rules. This may or may not be true. Lets be honest though. Wasn't this the same thing Juvie and 'em said? @ track record. *shrugs* 

The gist of these documents. James "Jas" Prince (Rap-A-Lot. ) , is filing the suit against Aspire Music Group, Cortez Bryant, Laurant Management, Three Kings, Gerald Roberson, and Derrick Lawrence. 

Prince was the one who 'discovered' Drake and had an agreement with the defendants that once he used his influence to get him signed with Lil Wayne and 'em , bread would be broken between the gentleman. 

It didn't happen. Cortez signed Drake over exclusively with Wayne and 'em. Pushing James Prince out of the mix as he was supposed to not only get paid BUT MANAGE DRAKE too. As we know, that didn't happen. A settlement was reached but Prince never got paid. 

Prince is saying he didn't get his money because DRAKE HASN'T GOTTEN HIS. In these documents... Hence the lawsuit for breach of contract. 

Here are a few pieces of the document. The documents are lengthy so A. If they are fake, someone took a LOT OF TIME TO WRITE THEM UP. B. I'm not capping all of that homie...Sorry... Go to Beverly's Twitter if you want to see the whole thing.. 

Read More

(Picture) Diddy and Shyne... I'll let ya'll handle the 'jokes'..

I will ask the more serious question.

Wonder what their conversations have been like? I'd be more interested in seeing how they mended, if they even NEEDED TO AS WE ALL SPECULATE ON WHAT THEY HAD GOING ON, their differences/that situation. You know the one.



 I hope they speak on it one or the other. Not in a bad way. I just really want to know. Maybe someone can learn from it. We always want folks to publicly play out their 'issues' for our entertainment and it would be nice to see something that clearly has been resolved on some level get spoken on. Ya'll go on ahead and slander away at the pic though. I'm cool on all of that.

Read More

Homeland Security's Domain Name Seizure May Stretch The Law Past The Breaking Point..article...

I am going to put a piece and then let you read the rest.....

We had a bunch of questions concerning the legality of Homeland Security's seizure of domain names via its Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) group. The whole thing seemed of extremely dubious legality. And it appears we're not the only ones to think so.

First, it's important to understand exactly what happened. Copycense points us to a useful analysis of how the seizures actually worked. Amazingly, it appears that Homeland Security contracted out the seizures to a private company, immixGroup IT Solutions, which set up the "seizedservers.com" domain that the seized domains now point to. The other bit of useful info is that the seizures appear to have been done directly by VeriSign at the top level domain level. VeriSign, of course, controls the .com TLD, and so Homeland Security appears to have just asked VeriSign to move the domains (with a court order, of course), and it did so.....


The rest of the VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE is here...You should read it especially if you consider yourself 'well versed' in 'rights'/the Internet/etc'....This will further explain the legalities of the recent seizures of OnSmash.com and others domain names and how it may or may not be 'legal'....

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101130/00494412051/homeland-securitys-domain-name-seizure-may-stretch-law-past-breaking-point.shtml

Read More

Rapist asks for a reduced sentence and judge lengths his sentence.

Be careful what you ask for. You need to read what he did before you just 'jump' on his side too. You probably won't though. As you were...



Link

A convicted rapist who asked the Indiana Court of Appeals to reduce his sentence instead got it extended by 25 years.

Thirty-five-year-old Jeffrey Akard of Peru had asked the judges to reduce his 93-year sentence to 40 years.
Advertisement

Instead they extended it to 118 years, citing the heinousness of the crime in which Akard held a homeless woman captive, zapped her with a stun gun and repeatedly raped her.

A state Supreme Court ruling last year reserved the power to increase sentences in unusual cases and noted the court had never done so.

Akard's attorney didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment Wednesday.

Read More