Top Gear's 'The Stig' revealed via court room news story.... ~ CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse

Okay...not for nothing but in this episode of Top Gear, they 'revealed' the true identity of 'The Stig'...

Michael Schumacher

Now I am guessing this was due to his contract with Ferrari...(He has one exclusively with them..) They also 'led us to believe' that he was actually him..Then I read this today...

I will just post up an excerpt as I don't want to be sued by them or by the BBC for claiming 'who the Stig' is. I am merely a consumer at this point who is a wee bit confused 'tis all.

"In his first interview since the BBC failed in a legal bid to block his memoir last week, Ben Collins also accused the BBC of hypocrisy saying that they were the ones who first revealed his identity.

The driver told the Sun today that the BBC was taking him for granted: "People seemed to have got used to me doing a stunt or slide brilliantly. If you do it right they look easy, but they're not. Yet Andy [Wilman, Top Gear executive producer] has since said I was the same as a Dalek or the Blue Peter dog. With respect to the Dalek operators, I don't think it's quite the same thing and I thought I could leave with more respect than that."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/tvandradioblog/2010/sep/10/stig-top-gear-bosses-dalek

I mean, personally, I don't care WHO THE STIG IS nor would revealing him stop me from watching the show. I love the show. Before the 'unveiling' of Michael, I had already assumed it was a series of drivers who performed the task anyway. I do know that the 'original Stig' is no longer on the show though so I figured it free them (BBC) up to use multiple drivers. I could be wrong. I don't KNOW...

Interesting though. It appears Collins is writing a book.....I hear (see) people saying 'Who would buy that?" If no one would buy it, then it shouldn't be a problem with him writing it then now should it? Take that and the fact that a COURT BATTLE has bought this man to light and one could assume that he is INDEED 'The Stig'. Or maybe not..You be the judge. I am just passing on the information...lol

(Waits for his 'Cease and desist' email from Blogger asking me to take this down)

Support

Let me be clear. I need you to SUPPORT the artist whose music you see/hear in the music player here. Some of them are my FRIENDS!! I want them to make money. So while I may put up a link here or there that they didn't 'endorse', it is only out of the love for their music and the fact that I want you to SUPPORT THEM. So please do. Seek out their music. Some of them are VASTLY UNDERRATED and your FAVORITE MUSICIAN loves them. So it isn't 'talent'. It is exposure. Which is all I am trying to give them here.. SO SUPPORT THEM!!!

Text Widget

Pictures/Women. I post 'em up ON THE REG. I post 'em, pay the compliments I want to when necessary and leave it at that. Period. If you happen to be the 'man in the young lady's life', don't worry dawg, I don't want your woman. I'm good.

If the fact that I do post up women means that you don't 'respect' any serious topic I discuss then your 'Fuck You and your respect ' is in the link below...Go ahead and read it....I think that should about cover how I feel about what 'you think'..

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/01/shoot-messengermiss-entire-fuck-outta.html

As for the 'woman' who are afraid of being 'exploited' by a site like the one I run here..Or who feel like I 'stole' your pics or something along those lines.. I have addressed you as well...

UPDATE: The Internet World has evolved. I will leave the disclaimer up however as most of you know, press is press to most people.

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/07/so-i-guess-i-have-to-be-bad-guy-it-isnt.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20blogspot%2FrDZx%20%28The%20WareHouse%29

I do occasionally interview folks so browse around. I don't call them interviews though. I call 'em 'Chats' 'cause that is usually what is like. Not claiming to be some CNN reporter over here. Just asking questions that many of us want answers to and some questions that some of you don't THINK TO ASK OR THINK CERTAIN FOLKS ARE GOING THROUGH/THINKING ABOUT/DOING. I like to dig deep so if you agree to an interview, be prepared. I might ask you anything. I probably will stay away from the majority of the 'standard' questions though. Just bare that in mind.

The popular posts usually contain enough POSITIVE examples of how this works great for both THE BLOG and the subjects of the posts. Usually, those post are a DIRECT RESULT of support from the young lady via a posting on THEIR OWN TWITTER, blog or Facebook. So thank you for that IN ADVANCE (and if you have done so in the past..) for that mutual support. It is appreciated. Truly.

Oh and one more thing...

I DON'T WATER MARK PICTURES THAT I DIDN'T EITHER TAKE OR WERE NOT ORIGINALLY GIVEN TO ME. I have seen folks RUSH TO DO IT and it is pretty damm sad. Not my style. I am not a fool. I know that most of what I do in regards to pictures can be replicated so there is no need to act like I'm out here doing more than what it is. I provide a space to see a collection of pictures in that regard. Nothing more. Nothing less. Watermarking pictures that aren't 'mine per say kinda comes off a little pompous to me. That's just me though..

I want you to be able to tell when I do TAKE THE PICTURE without me saying as much. What do I look like watermarking your pictures up if I didn't 'take them'?

You see the watermark on a picture here with the blog's name in it? Then you know I took the picture in some fashion. Screen shot. With the camera phone. With the Canon or the web cam. Or it was given to me for exclusive use. (At least at press time)

CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse