So Warner Bros...you think pulling Gucci Mane material is a great idea huh? ~ CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse

So Warner Bros...you think pulling Gucci Mane material is a great idea huh?

This ought to be interesting. I am not even a fan actually so it makes me no never mind IN THIS CASE. I do understand the other acts they have on the label though so maybe they think....they can't possibly think it is because he is signed to them that is the reason he is.....surely they understand that he sold mixtapes and that is how they have been able to eat off him....Oh never mind. As you were....

Link

Hip-hop artists have embraced mixtapes as the best route to circumvent the delays and legal hoopla that come along with releasing studio albums, but big labels aren't ready to let this one go with a fight.

On Thursday, April 9, Newindustrytips.com reported that Warner Bros. Records has taken action against mixtape distribution by sending copyright infringement claims to a number of websites who have hosted content from their recording artist, Gucci Mane. Warner Bros. has reportedly requested that all content and mention of the incarcerated rapper be removed from promotional hip-hop sites, barring legal action. One of the websites targeted in this purge is Coast2CoastMixtapes.com, a site which features a constant stream of promotional work from big artists such as Nas, Keri Hilson and Snoop Dogg, just to name a few.

Although the popular site was asked to remove all material by Gucci Mane, Coast2Coast CEO, Kyle "Lil Fats" Hiersche, explained that no files are actually hosted on the site. "The funny thing is we don't host any files on our site," Hiersche said. "We help promote music to the fans and use other parties to help our efforts, meaning we don't host any files but use providers like Datpiff.com to stream music." Hiersche concluded that if Warner Bros. plans to continue their purging mission, the site would have no problem ceasing to use their artists. "We like to promote music of all kinds but if Warner Bros. Records doesn't want to be included then we will gladly stop promoting all their artists," he said.

The irony of Warner Bros. current legal sweep is based on the fact that much of Gucci Mane's buzz was developed through promotional mixtape sites such as Coast2CoastMixtapes.com.

Support

Let me be clear. I need you to SUPPORT the artist whose music you see/hear in the music player here. Some of them are my FRIENDS!! I want them to make money. So while I may put up a link here or there that they didn't 'endorse', it is only out of the love for their music and the fact that I want you to SUPPORT THEM. So please do. Seek out their music. Some of them are VASTLY UNDERRATED and your FAVORITE MUSICIAN loves them. So it isn't 'talent'. It is exposure. Which is all I am trying to give them here.. SO SUPPORT THEM!!!

Text Widget

Pictures/Women. I post 'em up ON THE REG. I post 'em, pay the compliments I want to when necessary and leave it at that. Period. If you happen to be the 'man in the young lady's life', don't worry dawg, I don't want your woman. I'm good.

If the fact that I do post up women means that you don't 'respect' any serious topic I discuss then your 'Fuck You and your respect ' is in the link below...Go ahead and read it....I think that should about cover how I feel about what 'you think'..

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/01/shoot-messengermiss-entire-fuck-outta.html

As for the 'woman' who are afraid of being 'exploited' by a site like the one I run here..Or who feel like I 'stole' your pics or something along those lines.. I have addressed you as well...

UPDATE: The Internet World has evolved. I will leave the disclaimer up however as most of you know, press is press to most people.

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/07/so-i-guess-i-have-to-be-bad-guy-it-isnt.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20blogspot%2FrDZx%20%28The%20WareHouse%29

I do occasionally interview folks so browse around. I don't call them interviews though. I call 'em 'Chats' 'cause that is usually what is like. Not claiming to be some CNN reporter over here. Just asking questions that many of us want answers to and some questions that some of you don't THINK TO ASK OR THINK CERTAIN FOLKS ARE GOING THROUGH/THINKING ABOUT/DOING. I like to dig deep so if you agree to an interview, be prepared. I might ask you anything. I probably will stay away from the majority of the 'standard' questions though. Just bare that in mind.

The popular posts usually contain enough POSITIVE examples of how this works great for both THE BLOG and the subjects of the posts. Usually, those post are a DIRECT RESULT of support from the young lady via a posting on THEIR OWN TWITTER, blog or Facebook. So thank you for that IN ADVANCE (and if you have done so in the past..) for that mutual support. It is appreciated. Truly.

Oh and one more thing...

I DON'T WATER MARK PICTURES THAT I DIDN'T EITHER TAKE OR WERE NOT ORIGINALLY GIVEN TO ME. I have seen folks RUSH TO DO IT and it is pretty damm sad. Not my style. I am not a fool. I know that most of what I do in regards to pictures can be replicated so there is no need to act like I'm out here doing more than what it is. I provide a space to see a collection of pictures in that regard. Nothing more. Nothing less. Watermarking pictures that aren't 'mine per say kinda comes off a little pompous to me. That's just me though..

I want you to be able to tell when I do TAKE THE PICTURE without me saying as much. What do I look like watermarking your pictures up if I didn't 'take them'?

You see the watermark on a picture here with the blog's name in it? Then you know I took the picture in some fashion. Screen shot. With the camera phone. With the Canon or the web cam. Or it was given to me for exclusive use. (At least at press time)

CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse