(Words) So @kimkardashian's 'divorce' is threatening the 'sanc·ti·ty of marriage/making a mockery of it eh?" ~ CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse

(Words) So @kimkardashian's 'divorce' is threatening the 'sanc·ti·ty of marriage/making a mockery of it eh?"

Ya'll slay me. First it was 'The marriage will never last/lets take bets on how long it would last' and now it is 'Damm.....that quick? I thought it was gonna last for awhile'. Oh NOW ya'll wanna worry about the 'sanctity of marriage' and folks making a mockery of it as if REGULAR FOLKS AREN'T OUT HERE GOUGING HOLES IN IT ON THE REGULAR.

Not to mention that....Wait...I covered this on MY TIMELINE so I am just going to quote myself in case you missed it.

I think that just about covers my thoughts on Kim. As you know, I like her look but at the end of the day her marriage is just that...

Her marriage... I don't look to her or ANY OTHER PERSON IN THE PUBLIC EYE AS SOME SORT OF ROLE MODEL FOR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. The thing about marriage is that it doesn't care about 'status' or money. It is hard for EVERYONE so if it didn't work...it didn't work. Whether it took them one day to realize it or 1500 days. As for whether she did it for the money, that isn't my call nor MY CONCERN. I know folks out here who did for the money who are still married and I neither envy them nor worry about how their marriage is going. Those that got divorced in the same situation get equal concern. Zero.

I hear ya'll out here though. 'Mad about it'. (chuckles). Same folks who CLAIM you wouldn't get married anyway or don't believe it in to begin with. Or that it is against 'human nature'. Ya'll sound silly out here spouting off about you 'can't believe it didn't last' when your view of marriage is one of disapproval anyway.

I won't even speak on some of you talking about who have done (or are CURRENTLY DOING) 'devious' things with married people. You can MISS ME ALL THE WAY with the morality talk.

Anyway. Just thought I would address it here so that I wouldn't have to keep answering it. 'Cause you know I was asked since I post her pics up here all the time. I don't think any more or less of her than I did before. Luckily for some of you, I give you that same courtesy. Otherwise, I wouldn't fool with 3/4ths of you if I held you in judgment. Believe that. UPDATE: She released a statement.

*I put the word sanctity up phonetically for a reason. Can you figure out why?

Support

Let me be clear. I need you to SUPPORT the artist whose music you see/hear in the music player here. Some of them are my FRIENDS!! I want them to make money. So while I may put up a link here or there that they didn't 'endorse', it is only out of the love for their music and the fact that I want you to SUPPORT THEM. So please do. Seek out their music. Some of them are VASTLY UNDERRATED and your FAVORITE MUSICIAN loves them. So it isn't 'talent'. It is exposure. Which is all I am trying to give them here.. SO SUPPORT THEM!!!

Text Widget

Pictures/Women. I post 'em up ON THE REG. I post 'em, pay the compliments I want to when necessary and leave it at that. Period. If you happen to be the 'man in the young lady's life', don't worry dawg, I don't want your woman. I'm good.

If the fact that I do post up women means that you don't 'respect' any serious topic I discuss then your 'Fuck You and your respect ' is in the link below...Go ahead and read it....I think that should about cover how I feel about what 'you think'..

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/01/shoot-messengermiss-entire-fuck-outta.html

As for the 'woman' who are afraid of being 'exploited' by a site like the one I run here..Or who feel like I 'stole' your pics or something along those lines.. I have addressed you as well...

UPDATE: The Internet World has evolved. I will leave the disclaimer up however as most of you know, press is press to most people.

http://thewarehous.blogspot.com/2011/07/so-i-guess-i-have-to-be-bad-guy-it-isnt.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20blogspot%2FrDZx%20%28The%20WareHouse%29

I do occasionally interview folks so browse around. I don't call them interviews though. I call 'em 'Chats' 'cause that is usually what is like. Not claiming to be some CNN reporter over here. Just asking questions that many of us want answers to and some questions that some of you don't THINK TO ASK OR THINK CERTAIN FOLKS ARE GOING THROUGH/THINKING ABOUT/DOING. I like to dig deep so if you agree to an interview, be prepared. I might ask you anything. I probably will stay away from the majority of the 'standard' questions though. Just bare that in mind.

The popular posts usually contain enough POSITIVE examples of how this works great for both THE BLOG and the subjects of the posts. Usually, those post are a DIRECT RESULT of support from the young lady via a posting on THEIR OWN TWITTER, blog or Facebook. So thank you for that IN ADVANCE (and if you have done so in the past..) for that mutual support. It is appreciated. Truly.

Oh and one more thing...

I DON'T WATER MARK PICTURES THAT I DIDN'T EITHER TAKE OR WERE NOT ORIGINALLY GIVEN TO ME. I have seen folks RUSH TO DO IT and it is pretty damm sad. Not my style. I am not a fool. I know that most of what I do in regards to pictures can be replicated so there is no need to act like I'm out here doing more than what it is. I provide a space to see a collection of pictures in that regard. Nothing more. Nothing less. Watermarking pictures that aren't 'mine per say kinda comes off a little pompous to me. That's just me though..

I want you to be able to tell when I do TAKE THE PICTURE without me saying as much. What do I look like watermarking your pictures up if I didn't 'take them'?

You see the watermark on a picture here with the blog's name in it? Then you know I took the picture in some fashion. Screen shot. With the camera phone. With the Canon or the web cam. Or it was given to me for exclusive use. (At least at press time)

CarolinaWare's own: The WareHouse